SYMPOSIUM FORMAT
This event is by invitation only. Multiple organizations and agencies will be represented outside the
SLC’s, including various government, military, academic and private sector institutions. The content
of the symposium will be captured on a non-attribution basis and distributed to all attendees within 30 days.
A bibliography will be included based on the suggestions of symposium attendees and others.
The symposium will be facilitated by Mr. Peter Schwartz, an internationally renowned futurist and business strategist.
Assisted by Doug Randall, he will engage the audience in the contemplation of future scenarios, not just simple linear
extrapolations of current trends. His facilitation will be constructed so as to enable attendees to challenge
current thinking about how we educate and develop our future strategic leaders.
Some macro-level assumptions upon which the symposium is predicated include the following:
1. The U.S. is now in an era that may entail decades of ‘persistent conflict’;
2. The dynamically complex strategic environment has created a much broader set of significant national security issues
that requires a new strategic design / architecture;
3. National security education is not only imperative
across the federal government, but for relevant industries and state and local governments, as well.
In order to guide the discussion, some questions are postulated:
1.
What are
some defining characteristics of the 21st century strategic environment?
2.
What kind
of strategic leadership will be required, and what do strategic leaders need to know and do? What qualities
will strategic leaders need to be effective in meeting the challenges induced by the strategic environment?
3. To what extent, and in what ways, are those qualities different from those of the current generation of strategic
leaders?
4. To what extent, and in what ways, are those qualities
similar for military and civilian strategic leaders? To what extent, and in what ways, are they different?
5. What historical analogies are relevant
here:
»The emergence of the World War II leadership that enabled to United States to prevail in two major theaters
simultaneously?
»The emergence of the Cold War leadership in the late 1940s, which established policies and created
institutions attuned to this new world?
»The transition from the Cold War to the post-Berlin
Wall world?
6. How well are the relevant professional education
systems, civilian and military, doing at developing those qualities in their graduates? Are we educating
/ developing / training to fight the last war?
How can we reconcile / balance divergent demands
for individual advancement and short-term force structure stability, while satisfying longer-term national security interests?